SteelE01 at newschool.edu
03-01-1999, 07:40 PM
Hello all:
I am writing a paper on microfinance approaches or methodologies and
their potential for reducing poverty within a US urban context. I have
some detailed questions that need some answers, I would appreciate any
advice or answers.
Does the "FINCA" village banking model allow members of the bank to
self-select other borrowers from the community? Does that mean that
anyone in the village can become a member? How does FINCA define a
"village or community?" Is it based solely on geography?
In the "Grameen model" or solidarity lending, it appears that the
organization itself screens entire villages or communities to determine
who can qualify to borrow based on their level of poverty. However, in
the "village banking model" there is no organizational screening of
potential borrowers by level of poverty. Are my assumptions generally
correct?
If my assumptions are correct regarding both "models" then it is okay
to conclude that the problem that "microfinance or microenterprise
development" is addressing is not poverty or oppression (of
disadvantaged groups), but gaining access to credit, savings, and
insurance to those who have previously been denied (whether they are
poor women or minorities).
Do you think the underlying philosophy of microenterprise development
is the cause of poverty primarily due to market failures such as denial
of credit & savings (no collateral or lack of human capital) not
structural problems (like discrimination, sexism, and other forms of
systematic oppression)?
Thank you for your help!
Take care,
Eric
This post transferred from the cdb-l mailing list
I am writing a paper on microfinance approaches or methodologies and
their potential for reducing poverty within a US urban context. I have
some detailed questions that need some answers, I would appreciate any
advice or answers.
Does the "FINCA" village banking model allow members of the bank to
self-select other borrowers from the community? Does that mean that
anyone in the village can become a member? How does FINCA define a
"village or community?" Is it based solely on geography?
In the "Grameen model" or solidarity lending, it appears that the
organization itself screens entire villages or communities to determine
who can qualify to borrow based on their level of poverty. However, in
the "village banking model" there is no organizational screening of
potential borrowers by level of poverty. Are my assumptions generally
correct?
If my assumptions are correct regarding both "models" then it is okay
to conclude that the problem that "microfinance or microenterprise
development" is addressing is not poverty or oppression (of
disadvantaged groups), but gaining access to credit, savings, and
insurance to those who have previously been denied (whether they are
poor women or minorities).
Do you think the underlying philosophy of microenterprise development
is the cause of poverty primarily due to market failures such as denial
of credit & savings (no collateral or lack of human capital) not
structural problems (like discrimination, sexism, and other forms of
systematic oppression)?
Thank you for your help!
Take care,
Eric
This post transferred from the cdb-l mailing list