dwohl at TSO.UC.EDU
01-13-1995, 08:31 AM
Last week someone suggested using tenant damage or security deposits as a
loan pool.
Speaking as a reformed lawyer, now a lender, I find this troubling. The
deposits are the property of the tenant, and the landlords are essentially
holding them in trust. Unless the tenant damages the premises, or
stiffs the landlord on rent, the tenant is entitled to a return of the
deposits.
The trouble arises when there are defaults on the loan. That reduces the
total pool of security deposits, and who bears the loss? The tenant
certainly should not have to.
A variation on the idea is to fund a loan pool from the INTEREST on tenant
deposits. I think that Oregon (all you Oregonians can correct me if I'm
wrong) funds a state housing trust fund from tenant security deposits.
In most states, tenants don't get the interest on deposits, so there is
no breach of any duty to the tenant by using the interest to fund a loan
pool.
David Wohl, Cincinnati Development Fund
dwohl@tso.uc.edu
This post transferred from the cdb-l mailing list
loan pool.
Speaking as a reformed lawyer, now a lender, I find this troubling. The
deposits are the property of the tenant, and the landlords are essentially
holding them in trust. Unless the tenant damages the premises, or
stiffs the landlord on rent, the tenant is entitled to a return of the
deposits.
The trouble arises when there are defaults on the loan. That reduces the
total pool of security deposits, and who bears the loss? The tenant
certainly should not have to.
A variation on the idea is to fund a loan pool from the INTEREST on tenant
deposits. I think that Oregon (all you Oregonians can correct me if I'm
wrong) funds a state housing trust fund from tenant security deposits.
In most states, tenants don't get the interest on deposits, so there is
no breach of any duty to the tenant by using the interest to fund a loan
pool.
David Wohl, Cincinnati Development Fund
dwohl@tso.uc.edu
This post transferred from the cdb-l mailing list